All stories

Supreme Court ruling on counselor's refusal of conversion therapy

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Christian counselor who refused to perform conversion therapy on a transgender minor, holding that requiring counselors to affirm a client's gender identity violates the Free Speech Clause. The decision was based on the counselor's claim that the state licensing board violated her First Amendment rights by compelling speech inconsistent with her religious beliefs.

2 sources2 articles
CBS NewsCBS NewsAddiction Patterns
70

Supreme Court sides with Colorado counselor in conversion therapy case

Washington — The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled in favor of a Colorado counselor who challenged a state law that bans "conversion therapy" for minors. The high court ruled 8-1 that Colorado's law, when applied to talk therapy provided by counselor Kaley Chiles, regulates speech based on viewpoint

Addiction PatternsOpen Loop / Cliffhanger
This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Signals incompleteness ('will be updated') and defers resolution, creating an open loop that encourages return consumption of a story flagged as breaking.

Read Full Article
Daily CallerDaily CallerLoaded Language
27

Supreme Court Sides With Christian Counselor Who Challenged Law That Requires Affirming Kids’ Gender Confusion

The Supreme Court sided Tuesday with a Christian mental health counselor who challenged Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy.” The justices held 8-1 that Colorado’s law, which forces counselor Kaley Chiles to affirm minors’ gender dysphoria even when they desire help feeling comfortable in their

Loaded LanguageLoaded Language
forces counselor Kaley Chiles to affirm minors’ gender dysphoria even when they desire help feeling comfortable in their bodies

The word 'forces' frames the law as coercive state action, and the phrasing 'even when they desire help feeling comfortable in their bodies' reframes the challenged conduct as victim-seeking-help, using emotionally charged language that goes beyond neutral description of the legal dispute.

Loaded LanguageLoaded Language
censorious governments throughout history have believed the same

Gorsuch's quoted language uses 'censorious governments throughout history' as a loaded comparative frame, invoking authoritarian regimes to characterize the challenged law.

FramingVictim Inversion
sided with a Christian mental health counselor who challenged Colorado’s ban on 'conversion therapy' — a law, which forces counselor Kaley Chiles to affirm minors’ gender dysphoria even when they desire help feeling comfortable in their bodies

Frames the law exclusively as forcing a counselor to affirm minors' gender dysphoria against her will, presenting only the plaintiff's perspective of the law's operation and omitting the law's stated protections for minors.

Read Full Article

Value for value. If this tool is useful to you, help us keep it free for everyone.

Give Back